| A00 |
Misc. flank openings |
|
Daly – Scott |
½-½ |
33 |
|
Keogh – Haque |
0-1 |
47 |
|
Keogh – Tirziman |
1-0 |
55 |
|
Keogh – Mirza |
0-1 |
79 |
|
Keogh – MacElligott |
0-1 |
29 |
| A04 |
Réti opening |
|
MacElligott – Melaugh |
0-1 |
43 |
| A05 |
Réti opening |
|
Beatty – Delaney |
0-1 |
56 |
| A10 |
English |
|
Daly – Jessel |
0-1 |
102 |
| A11 |
English |
|
Melaugh – Beatty |
0-1 |
42 |
| A14 |
English |
|
Jessel – Fox |
1-0 |
35 |
| A15 |
English, 1...Nf6 (Anglo-Indian defense) |
|
Jessel – O'Connell |
½-½ |
110 |
|
Jessel – O'Neill |
1-0 |
60 |
| A24 |
English, Bremen system with ...g6 |
|
Melaugh – O'Neill |
0-1 |
49 |
| A26 |
English, Botvinnik system |
|
Daly – O'Connell |
1-0 |
88 |
| A41 |
Queen's Pawn |
|
Scott – Delaney |
0-1 |
36 |
| A96 |
Dutch classical variation |
|
Jessel – MacElligott |
1-0 |
27 |
| B06 |
Robatsch (modern) defence |
|
MacElligott – Daly |
0-1 |
61 |
| B07 |
Pirc defence |
|
O'Neill – Keogh |
1-0 |
40 |
| B10 |
Caro-Kann defence |
|
O'Neill – Haque |
1-0 |
26 |
| B12 |
Caro-Kann defence |
|
Mirza – Haque |
0-1 |
63 |
| B15 |
Caro-Kann, 3.Nc3 |
|
Fox – Haque |
1-0 |
28 |
| B22 |
Sicilian, 2.c3 |
|
Delaney – O'Connell |
½-½ |
32 |
|
Delaney – Mirza |
1-0 |
32 |
| B24 |
Sicilian, closed |
|
Fox – O'Connell |
½-½ |
26 |
| B30 |
Sicilian defence, 2...Nc6 |
|
Tirziman – Melaugh |
0-1 |
40 |
|
Tirziman – Thee |
½-½ |
29 |
|
Mirza – Melaugh |
1-0 |
31 |
| B31 |
Sicilian, Nimzovitch-Rossolimo attack |
|
Tirziman – MacElligott |
1-0 |
47 |
| B33 |
Sicilian, 2...Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 |
|
Butler – Melaugh |
½-½ |
47 |
| B40 |
Sicilian, 2.Nf3 e6 |
|
Thee – Mirza |
0-1 |
40 |
|
Melaugh – Keogh |
0-1 |
61 |
|
Beatty – Keogh |
0-1 |
48 |
| B41 |
Sicilian Kan |
|
O'Neill – Daly |
0-1 |
52 |
| B42 |
Sicilian Kan, 5.Bd3 |
|
Butler – Daly |
0-1 |
37 |
| B46 |
Sicilian Taimanov |
|
Thee – Melaugh |
1-0 |
23 |
| B50 |
Sicilian, 2.Nf3 d6 |
|
Beatty – MacElligott |
0-1 |
42 |
| B52 |
Sicilian Rossolimo, 3...Bd7 |
|
Tirziman – O'Neill |
1-0 |
45 |
| B90 |
Sicilian Najdorf |
|
Butler – O'Neill |
1-0 |
75 |
| C00 |
French defence |
|
Mirza – Jessel |
0-1 |
37 |
|
Fox – Scott |
½-½ |
27 |
|
Mirza – Beatty |
½-½ |
25 |
|
Fox – Beatty |
1-0 |
31 |
| C03 |
French Tarrasch |
|
Delaney – Jessel |
0-1 |
34 |
| C11 |
French, 3.Nc3 Nf6 |
|
Thee – MacElligott |
0-1 |
35 |
|
Butler – Jessel |
0-1 |
17 |
| C29 |
Vienna gambit |
|
Delaney – Fox |
1-0 |
43 |
| C50 |
King's pawn game |
|
Delaney – Butler |
1-0 |
50 |
| C53 |
Giuoco Piano |
|
Mirza – Butler |
0-1 |
32 |
| C55 |
Two knights defence |
|
Thee – Keogh |
½-½ |
69 |
| C58 |
Two knights defence |
|
Melaugh – Fox |
0-1 |
62 |
| C92 |
Ruy Lopez, closed, 9.h3 |
|
Daly – Fox |
½-½ |
84 |
| D04 |
Queen's pawn game |
|
Beatty – Thee |
1-0 |
25 |
| D05 |
Queen's pawn game |
|
Beatty – Tirziman |
1-0 |
22 |
| D07 |
Chigorin defence |
|
O'Connell – Thee |
1-0 |
48 |
|
Haque – Thee |
1-0 |
26 |
| D12 |
Slav, 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 Bf5 |
|
Haque – Scott |
0-1 |
23 |
|
Thee – Scott |
0-1 |
37 |
| D15 |
Slav, 4.Nc3 |
|
O'Neill – Beatty |
1-0 |
42 |
|
O'Connell – Scott |
½-½ |
29 |
| D37 |
Queen's gambit declined, 4.Nf3 |
|
Tirziman – Mirza |
½-½ |
11 |
|
Butler – Fox |
1-0 |
49 |
| D43 |
QGD semi-Slav |
|
Haque – Jessel |
0-1 |
48 |
| D85 |
Grünfeld exchange variation |
|
MacElligott – O'Neill |
1-0 |
55 |
| D91 |
Grünfeld, 5.Bg5 |
|
Haque – O'Connell |
1-0 |
56 |
| E10 |
Queen's pawn game |
|
Scott – Tirziman |
0-1 |
45 |
| E11 |
Bogo-Indian defence |
|
Haque – Daly |
0-1 |
54 |
| E50 |
Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 O-O, 5.Nf3, without ...d5 |
|
O'Connell – Tirziman |
1-0 |
42 |
| E61 |
King's Indian, Smyslov system |
|
MacElligott – Delaney |
0-1 |
58 |
| E91 |
King's Indian, 6.Be2 |
|
Scott – Keogh |
1-0 |
42 |
| E94 |
King's Indian, orthodox variation |
|
O'Connell – Butler |
0-1 |
48 |
|
Scott – Butler |
0-1 |
36 |
| E97 |
King's Indian, orthodox, Aronin-Taimanov variation |
|
Daly – Delaney |
1-0 |
60 |
|