| A01 |
Nimzovitch-Larsen attack |
|
Scott – Melaugh, G. |
0-1 |
29 |
| A05 |
Réti opening |
|
MacElligott – Scott |
1-0 |
31 |
|
Mirza – Scott |
1-0 |
38 |
|
Lopez – Li |
1-0 |
35 |
| A06 |
Réti opening |
|
Daly – O'Donnell |
½-½ |
22 |
| A08 |
Réti |
|
Fox – Scott |
0-1 |
38 |
| A10 |
English |
|
Melaugh, S. – Short |
½-½ |
42 |
|
Melaugh, G. – O'Donnell |
0-1 |
53 |
| A12 |
English |
|
Lopez – Fox |
1-0 |
76 |
| A15 |
English, 1...Nf6 (Anglo-Indian defense) |
|
Lopez – Scott |
1-0 |
49 |
| A22 |
English, 1....e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 |
|
Melaugh, S. – Melaugh, G. |
0-1 |
64 |
| A28 |
English, four knights system |
|
Daly – Tirziman |
1-0 |
38 |
|
O'Donnell – Quinn |
1-0 |
28 |
| A36 |
English, symmetrical variation |
|
Melaugh, S. – Mirza |
1-0 |
30 |
|
Melaugh, G. – MacElligott |
0-1 |
60 |
| A40 |
Queen's pawn |
|
Melaugh, G. – Tirziman |
½-½ |
80 |
| A48 |
King's Indian defence |
|
Daly – Lopez |
0-1 |
97 |
| A80 |
Dutch defence |
|
Scott – Melaugh, S. |
1-0 |
32 |
|
MacElligott – Wall |
0-1 |
50 |
|
MacElligott – Melaugh, S. |
1-0 |
40 |
| A81 |
Dutch defence, 2.g3 |
|
Baburin – Short |
0-1 |
63 |
|
Short – Wall |
½-½ |
13 |
| B00 |
King's pawn opening |
|
Tirziman – Melaugh, S. |
½-½ |
64 |
| B03 |
Alekhine's defence |
|
Li – Baburin |
0-1 |
50 |
| B04 |
Alekhine's defence, modern variation |
|
Delaney – Baburin |
½-½ |
37 |
| B05 |
Alekhine's defence, modern variation, 4...Bg4 |
|
Mirza – Baburin |
0-1 |
52 |
| B07 |
Pirc defence |
|
Delaney – O'Donnell |
0-1 |
41 |
| B09 |
Pirc, Austrian attack |
|
Quinn – Baburin |
0-1 |
27 |
| B10 |
Caro-Kann defence |
|
Wall – Lopez |
0-1 |
40 |
| B12 |
Caro-Kann defence |
|
Wall – Delaney |
1-0 |
43 |
|
Quinn – Lopez |
0-1 |
38 |
| B13 |
Caro-Kann exchange variation |
|
Melaugh, S. – Delaney |
0-1 |
58 |
| B17 |
Caro-Kann, Steinitz variation |
|
Tirziman – Delaney |
1-0 |
41 |
| B19 |
Caro-Kann, classical, 7...Nd7 |
|
Tirziman – MacElligott |
0-1 |
70 |
| B23 |
Sicilian closed |
|
Fox – Melaugh, G. |
½-½ |
33 |
|
Fox – Mirza |
1-0 |
34 |
| B24 |
Sicilian, closed |
|
Fox – Melaugh, S. |
½-½ |
24 |
| B30 |
Sicilian defence, 2...Nc6 |
|
Delaney – MacElligott |
1-0 |
57 |
| B40 |
Sicilian, 2.Nf3 e6 |
|
Delaney – Mirza |
½-½ |
38 |
| B43 |
Sicilian Kan, 5.Nc3 |
|
Quinn – Daly |
0-1 |
24 |
| C00 |
French defence |
|
Mirza – Melaugh, G. |
0-1 |
97 |
| C01 |
French, exchange variation |
|
Scott – Tirziman |
½-½ |
10 |
| C06 |
French Tarrasch, 3...Nf6 main line |
|
Mirza – MacElligott |
½-½ |
55 |
| C11 |
French, 3.Nc3 Nf6 |
|
Li – Tirziman |
1-0 |
28 |
|
Quinn – Melaugh, S. |
½-½ |
56 |
| C16 |
French Winawer, 4.e5 |
|
Quinn – Short |
0-1 |
39 |
|
Quinn – Tirziman |
1-0 |
34 |
| C41 |
Philidor |
|
Tirziman – Mirza |
½-½ |
12 |
| C55 |
Two knights defence |
|
Mirza – Quinn |
0-1 |
48 |
|
Wall – Fox |
½-½ |
94 |
| C58 |
Two knights defence |
|
Melaugh, G. – Li |
0-1 |
54 |
| C67 |
Ruy Lopez, Berlin defence, open variation |
|
Li – Short |
½-½ |
22 |
| C75 |
Ruy Lopez, modern Steinitz defence |
|
Li – Wall |
½-½ |
8 |
| C92 |
Ruy Lopez, closed, 9.h3 |
|
Li – Fox |
1-0 |
41 |
| D00 |
Queen's pawn game |
|
MacElligott – Fox |
0-1 |
73 |
|
Melaugh, G. – Quinn |
0-1 |
39 |
|
Wall – Daly |
½-½ |
57 |
| D02 |
Queen's pawn game |
|
Lopez – Short |
0-1 |
38 |
| D10 |
Slav defence |
|
O'Donnell – Lopez |
½-½ |
43 |
| D11 |
Slav, 3.Nf3 |
|
Baburin – Lopez |
½-½ |
13 |
| D36 |
Queen's gambit declined, positional line |
|
Baburin – Fox |
1-0 |
60 |
| D43 |
QGD semi-Slav |
|
MacElligott – O'Donnell |
0-1 |
53 |
| D45 |
QGD semi-Slav, 5.e3 |
|
Short – O'Donnell |
1-0 |
55 |
| D52 |
Queen's gambit declined |
|
Short – Daly |
1-0 |
62 |
|
O'Donnell – Baburin |
½-½ |
52 |
| E32 |
Nimzo-Indian, classical variation |
|
O'Donnell – Wall |
1-0 |
23 |
| E60 |
King's Indian defence |
|
Short – Delaney |
½-½ |
24 |
| E69 |
King's Indian, fianchetto, classical main line |
|
Baburin – Daly |
½-½ |
16 |
| E94 |
King's Indian, orthodox variation |
|
Daly – Li |
1-0 |
54 |
|
Daly – Delaney |
1-0 |
49 |
| E97 |
King's Indian, orthodox, Aronin-Taimanov variation |
|
Scott – Li |
0-1 |
28 |
|