“Here’s one that wasn’t so good”: Alekhine-Barry, Dublin 1938

The Simuls page has a list of the illustrious visitors to Ireland down the years: these include Steinitz, Capablanca, Alekhine, Euwe, Smyslov, and Topalov, all world champions at one time or other. But only one of these was the reigning world champion during the visit. Alekhine gave three simuls in September 1938: in Dublin (Regent House, Trinity) on the 14th and 15h, and Belfast (Clarence Place) on the 17th.

The results were +31 =3 -1 and +28 =7 -0, respectively, in Dublin, and a clean +34 =0 -0 sweep in Belfast. Thus he lost only one game, versus Charles J. Barry (Sackville). Barry won the Leinster championship seven times, including the first three championships in 1912-14, as well as at least two Armstrong cups with Sackville (probably many more). He was never Irish champion: the closest he got was =2nd in 1940, ½ point behind O’Hanlon.

Alekhine-Barry, First simul, Dublin 1938It seems only two games from the entire visit survived (neither one in the ICU games archive, surprisingly), of which the only complete one is Barry’s win. Alekhine blundered in the opening (16. Bg8?) and it all went downhill from there. From the diagram the finish was 29. Re7 Ne6 30. Rf7? Nf6 31. Re7 Kg8 0-1.

[Click to replay the full game.]

There’s more to the story: at the end of the game, Barry asked Alekhine to sign his scoresheet, but Alekhine waved him away angrily and refused. Barry can’t have liked that, but what can you do? When “My Best Games of Chess 1924-1937″ came out, Barry pasted the scoresheet onto the inside front cover and wrote across the top “Here’s one that wasn’t so good.” (Source: J.J. Walsh.)

Posted in Games, Simuls | Leave a comment

From Cork 2013

TWIC 963 had 23 games from the Cork Masters 2013, now all posted in the games archive.

Doyle-Baburin, Cork Masters 2013In the second round, local player and newly minted Irish U-19 champion Hugh Doyle was up against Alexander Baburin, and reached the following position, as White, to play. He went wrong with 31. Kd3? Kb6 32. Bd4+? and lost quickly after 32. … Bxd4 33. Kxd4 c5+ 34. Kd3 b3! 0-1.

In retrospect he probably wished he had tried 31. Kb3!? from the diagrammed position, with a view to blocking the entire position and preventing Black from infiltrating. What is your evaluation of the resulting position?

Answer (or at least my answer) in a few days.

Posted in Games, Puzzles | 1 Comment

Alex Montwill

Alex MontwillJ.J. Walsh has sent the news that Alex Montwill, who has been mentioned here several times, died two weeks ago, on April 18th. He was 78.

As previously discussed here, he finished equal first in an Irish championship but was never Irish champion, losing out on tie-break inthe 1962 championship in Derry (8-round Swiss, 16 players, finishing =1st-4thon 5½/8 with John B. Reid, Michael Littleton, and Brian Reilly; Reid and Littleton were declared joint Irish champions on tie-break). However he had the consolation of being (joint) Irish correspondence champion in 1963. He also played on two winning interprovincial Leinster teams in 1961 and 1964, on boards 11 and 5 respectively in the finals. He gave up chess relatively early and switched instead to bridge (as did so many other Irish players over the years), where he was apparently a very strong player.

He was most prominent (and apparently very well known) as a physicist, and was a Professor of Experimental Physics at UCD, where he worked in one capacity or another for over 40 years.

In a 43-minute interview from an Institute of Physics Ireland event in 2010, he gives many interesting details of his background. He was born in Riga, Latvia around 1935, and recalled the family hiding from invading Soviet troops during the war, moving around in Lithuania and Poland for a few years and ending in Germany. He moved to Ireland in 1947; apparently not just any refugee could do so at the time, and some connection to Ireland was required. In his case, one of his ancestors, an O’Rourke, was one of the Wild Geese, and a branch of the family, all O’Rourke’s, ended up over the centuries working for the Tsars.

A brief biographical summary has been added to the main players page. A more detailed page will be added at some point. The ICU games archive has just two of his games; does anyone know of any others?

Posted in News, Players | 1 Comment

The New Winawer Report, issue 4

The fourth issue of The New Winawer Report has been posted: see the tnwr page. This one continues with the main line of the poisoned pawn variation. A game from this year’s Gibraltar Masters, Janev-Quillan, featured 13. Be3. This was for a brief time one of the main recommended variations for White, but has been under a cloud for decades. But in Janev-Quillan, White got an excellent position from the opening, and duly won.

What went wrong for Black? Issue 4 considers the point, along with some of the theory of the 13. Be3 variation.

Posted in Articles | Leave a comment

Jonathan O’Connor awarded CC-IM title

Colm Daly’s galling near-miss of an IM norm last month happened just as I was leaving for a trip to Shanghai–as I left the house I thought he had it in the bag. Disappointing! But that is the way with norms: it seems there are a dozen near-misses for every actual success.

With the topic of norms in mind I remembered Jonathan O’Connor telling me about his near-misses in correspondence chess ten years ago. He earned two SIM norms (Senior International Master, roughly halfway between IM and GM), but fell short of that title, and two SIM norms didn’t automatically translate into an IM title either.

There’s a provision in the ICCF rules for national federations to make an exceptional application, so with time to kill at my meeting I idly tried to see if there was some way of constructing a case for Jonathan, for the IM title at least. The rules are that two norms are needed, covering at least 24 games. Jonathan’s norms were 7 / 10 in the Champions League Qualification Group 7 Board 1 (Category 5: SIM = 7, IM = 6½) and 9 / 11 in the 15th ICCF Correspondence Olympiad preliminaries Section 1 Board 5 (Category 4: SIM = 8, IM = 7½). So two norms, but only 21 games.

With the national exceptional application in mind, and seeing that Jonathan had scored well over the required minimum in each case, for the IM title in particular, I wondered what would happen if extra players were added into each event, without lowering the category, and Jonathan had just lost the extra games, but still leaving him with valid norms in the hypothetical expanded event. I found that 7 / 11 is enough for an IM norm for category 5, and 9 / 13 for category 4. So 24 games. Well, well, well!

But there was another pleasant surprise: when I searched on the ICCF site for how to go about making the case, and how previous applications for national exceptional applications had been formatted, I found that the 2011 ICCF Congress had codified this exact procedure into the regulations, because so many others had had exactly the same idea and there had never been an objection.

I submitted the writeup to Tim Harding, Ireland’s ICCF representative, who forwarded to the ICCF, and today the answer arrived from the ICCF Qualifications Commissioner: title approved, and indeed already recorded on the ICCF website, medal and certificate to be awarded at the ICCF Congress in Poland in July.

Jonathan O'Connor CC-IM

Congratulations to Jonathan! A richly deserved honour: he had a very high success rate for norms (2 norms out of the only 3 events he played) and would surely have gained the title long ago if he had had the time to spend on more tournaments.

My only regret is that we didn’t arrange to have the notification delivered on April 1, just to make it interesting. It only occurred to me afterwards.

Posted in News, Players | Leave a comment

An Armstrong puzzle

Dunne-Casey, Armstrong Cup 1999-2000Black to play: how do you evaluate the consequences of 19. … f4!?

This is from the game Oliver Dunne-Eoghan Casey, Elm Mount v. Gonzaga, Armstrong Cup 1999-2000. (Thanks to Oliver for supplying it.)

Posted in Armstrong Cup, Games, Puzzles | Leave a comment

12th Gonzaga Classic 2013: Masters

For some reason I’ve fallen behind in processing tournaments: probably this is because they’re more work than grabbing a game and adding it to the archive. Anyway this year’s Gonzaga Masters has now been added. Winner of the Masters, and Philip Hogarty Cup, for the fourth year in a row was David Fitzsimons. Well done to the organisers for making all games from the Masters available.

Posted in Gonzaga Classics, Tournaments | Leave a comment

Disinformator 42

It has been an unusually eventful couple of weeks in Irish chess, with one of the closest (relegation) finishes ever in the Armstrong Cup on Sunday last, and the second e2e4 Dublin Masters beginning today.

More on those items later as more information rolls in. In the meantime, this week also had very welcome and unexpected news with the return of DisinformatorTM after an extended break. This, the club magazine of Oxford City C.C., has been edited for years by Seán Terry, formerly of Dublin C.C., and was previously discussed here. Highly recommended!

I haven’t had a chance to go through the latest issue yet, but the Irish games from Disinformator 41 have been added to the archive: 20 games of Seán Terry’s, and 6 more involving Rod Nixon.

Brown-Terry, Disinformator 41Here is one excerpt from these games, from the feature “Blunder and/or Brilliancy?”, from the game Brown-Terry, Chiltern League Div. 1 2010-11. Play continued 11. … Ng4!? 12. hxg4 hxg4 13. g3. Blunder and/or brilliancy?

Once you’ve answered that, a second question based on the game continuation. What is the verdict with best play after Black’s 18th?

Answers in a few days.

Posted in Games, Puzzles | 1 Comment

The New Winawer Report, issue 3

The third issue of The New Winawer Report has been posted: see the tnwr page. This one moves on to the main line of the poisoned pawn variation.

Moskalenko's suggestionIn the main line with 10. Ne2 Nbc6 11. f4 Bd7 12. Qd3 dxc3, White’s most critical continuation is probably 13. Qxc3. This is often, even usually, met by 13. … 0-0-0. But Moskalenko suggests in his recent book The Wonderful Winawer that this is an inaccuracy that allows 14. Ng3, which he awards a ‘!’, reaching the diagram at right, and a position he evaluates as better for White. Similarly the older 13. Ng3, if met by the common 13. … 0-0-0, allows White to reach the diagrammed position with 14. Qxc3. Moskalenko therefore suggests that 13. Qxc3 should be met by 13. … Nf5, ‘!’, and 13. Ng3 by 13. … d4 ‘!’.

Is he right? Issue 3 considers the point in detail, along with the theory of the 13. Ng3 variation.

Posted in Articles | Leave a comment

Monthly updates: December, January, and February

Here is an update on the items over the past three months that weren’t the subject of separate posts.

Extra search feature:

Most new games are added to a “Sundry” folder, with a new folder created for each month. A new addition to the search feature allows these “Sundry” folders to be searched individually. To search for February 2013, for example, type “-month2013-02″ in the “Search Games” box. This makes it easy to search for new games. The results for the past three months can be found in searches for December (227 games, 15 results without moves, 1 bye/walkover/default), January (11 games), and February (73 games, 15 results without moves, 4 byes/walkovers/defaults).

Games collection:

In addition to the “Sundry” games, we’ve started the process of porting games over from OlimpBase. In addition to the Irish games from Warsaw 1935, the subject of a recent post, the archive also has 8 games and 3 results without moves of C.H.O’D. Alexander’s from the 5th Olympiad in Folkestone, 1933, where he was representing Great Britain. (He played 11 games so all are covered.) The ICU games archive contains 5 of these.

The en passant bug:

In playing through one of the recent games added, I found a strange bug in which the HTML didn’t render some en passant captures correctly: if White captured exf6, say, the pawn on f5 would stay but any piece on d5 would disappear. I tracked the bug down to my misunderstanding of how the javascript file underlying the Palview system works. En passant captures are represented by one of two different symbols (“d” or “t”). I thought one of these was for captures by White and the other for captures by Black. But no: it turns out that one is for captures to the left as White looks at the board (e.g., dxc6 for White or dxc3 for Black), and the other is for captures to the right as White looks at the board, e.g., exf6 or exf3. (!) So captures of the type exf6 or dxc3 are implemented incorrectly.

This has now been corrected on many of the older files in the site, but not yet all.

Posted in Administrative | Leave a comment